Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.432
Filtrar
1.
Expert Rev Med Devices ; : 1-7, 2024 Apr 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38661659

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are superior to central venous catheters (CVCs); therefore, we compared post-implantation complications between CVC and PICC groups. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients who received CVCs or PICCs between April 2010 and March 2018 were identified from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, a national inpatient database in Japan. The outcomes of interest included catheter infection, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and phlebitis. Propensity score overlap weighting was used to balance patient backgrounds. Outcomes were compared using logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: We identified 164,185 eligible patients, including 161,605 (98.4%) and 2,580 (1.6%) in the CVC and PICC groups, respectively. The PICC group was more likely to have overall complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32-2.19), pulmonary embolism (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.38-3.89), deep vein thrombosis (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.16-2.99), and phlebitis (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.27-2.32) than the CVC group. There was no significant intergroup difference in catheter infection (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.39-3.04). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PICCs had a significantly greater incidence of complications than did those with CVCs. Further research is necessary to explore the factors contributing to these complications.

2.
World J Nephrol ; 13(1): 90542, 2024 Mar 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38596268

RESUMEN

Point of care ultrasonography (POCUS) has evolved to become the fifth pillar of the conventional physical examination, and use of POCUS protocols have significantly decreased procedure complications and time to diagnose. However, lack of experience in POCUS by preceptors in medical schools and nephrology residency programs are significant barriers to implement a broader use. In rural and low-income areas POCUS may have a transformative effect on health care management.

3.
Res Pract Thromb Haemost ; 8(3): 102391, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38660454

RESUMEN

Background: Managing central venous catheters in patients with neoplasms is challenging, and peripherally inserted central catheter PORT (PICC-PORT) has emerged as a promising option for safety and efficacy. However, understanding the clinical progression of catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in cancer patients with central venous catheters remains limited, especially in certain neoplasm types associated with a higher risk of venous thrombosis. Objectives: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided management in detecting and treating asymptomatic CRT in cancer patients with PICC. Methods: In this prospective cohort study of 120 patients with solid neoplasms receiving chemotherapy, we investigated the incidence of isolated upper-extremity superficial vein thrombosis, upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis, and fibrin sheath formation through ultrasound follow-up at 30 and 90 days after catheter insertion. We analyzed risk factors associated with CRT and compared incidence rates between PICC-PORT and traditional PICC. Results: Among the cohort, 69 patients (57.5%) had high-risk thromboembolic neoplasm, and 31 cases (25.8%) of CRT were observed, mostly within 30 days, with only 7 cases (22.6%) showing symptoms. Traditional PICC use (odds ratio, 5.86; 95% CI, 1.14-30) and high-risk thromboembolic neoplasm (odds ratio, 4.46; 95% CI, 1.26-15.81) were identified as independent risk factors for CRT. Conclusion: The majority of CRT present asymptomatically within the first 30 days of venous catheter insertion in patients with solid neoplasms. Ultrasound follow-up is valuable for detecting asymptomatic CRT. The risk of CRT was lower with PICC-PORT than with PICC. Additionally, the risk of CRT was found to be higher in patients with high-risk thromboembolic neoplasms. It is crucial for larger studies to confirm the utility of treating asymptomatic thromboses and isolated superficial thrombosis.

4.
Radiol Case Rep ; 19(7): 2579-2584, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38645954

RESUMEN

Subclavian artery injuries during internal jugular vein puncture when attempting central venous catheter insertion are rare. A 60-year-old man undergoing treatment for neuromyelitis optica with paralysis and sensory loss developed a complication during catheter placement into his right internal jugular vein for plasmapheresis. His previous physician felt resistance and discontinued the procedure. The patient later developed mild dyspnea and dysphagia. Computed tomography scans indicated thrombus formation and tracheal deviation. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans showed right subclavian artery injury with extravasation and a large pseudoaneurysm. Following transferal to our hospital, he was stable and asymptomatic; however, contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans showed a pseudoaneurysm located proximal to the right subclavian artery. Considering challenges with compression hemostasis and the invasiveness of open surgery, endovascular treatment was selected using a VIABAHN stent graft. A balloon occlusion test of the right vertebral artery was performed to assess stroke risk. Prophylactic embolization of the right vertebral artery, internal thoracic artery, and thyrocervical trunk were performed to prevent a type 2 endoleak. On hospital day 5, our patient showed no postoperative complications and was transferred to the referring hospital. Follow-up imaging showed the graft was intact with no pseudoaneurysm, confirming successful treatment. Endovascular treatment with a stent graft is highly effective for peripheral artery injuries. Using a balloon occlusion test to assess collateral blood flow and stroke risk is essential pretreatment, especially when a graft might occlude the vertebral artery. Balloon occlusion tests are recommended when planning treatment for iatrogenic and other types of subclavian artery injuries.

5.
Cureus ; 16(3): e56716, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38646372

RESUMEN

Septic thrombophlebitis of the internal jugular vein is characterized as Lemierre syndrome. Patients typically present with sore throat and fever and may present with a tender neck mass due to thrombophlebitis of the internal jugular vein. We present the case of a 57-year-old male with neck pain, fever, chills, and headaches who was diagnosed with internal jugular vein septic thrombophlebitis associated with catheter-related introduction of bacteria.

6.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 19(1): 259, 2024 Apr 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38643163

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The malposition of central venous catheters (CVCs) may lead to vascular damage, perforation, and even mediastinal injury. The malposition of CVC from the right subclavian vein into the azygos vein is extremely rare. Here, we report a patient with CVC malposition into the azygos vein via the right subclavian vein. We conduct a comprehensive review of the anatomical structure of the azygos vein and the manifestations associated with azygos vein malposition. Additionally, we explore the resolution of repositioning the catheter into the superior vena cava by carefully withdrawing a specific length of the catheter. CASE PRESENTATION: A 79-year-old female presented to our department with symptoms of complete intestinal obstruction. A double-lumen CVC was inserted via the right subclavian vein to facilitate total parenteral nutrition. Due to the slow onset of sedative medications during surgery, the anesthetist erroneously believed that the CVC had penetrated the superior vena cava, leading to the premature removal of the CVC. Postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the chest confirmed that the central venous catheter had not penetrated the superior vena cava but malpositioned into the azygos vein. The patient was discharged 15 days after surgery without any complications. CONCLUSIONS: CVC malposition into the azygos vein is extremely rare. Clinical practitioners should be vigilant regarding this form of catheter misplacement. Ensuring the accurate positioning of the CVC before each infusion is crucial. Utilizing chest X-rays in both frontal and lateral views, as well as chest computed tomography, can aid in confirming the presence of catheter misplacement.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Femenino , Humanos , Anciano , Vena Ácigos/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Ácigos/cirugía , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Vena Cava Superior/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Cava Superior/cirugía , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Mediastino
7.
Vascular ; : 17085381241244867, 2024 Apr 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38569483

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to collect evidence to improve the arteriovenous fistula practice by investigating vascular access routes and by identifying the factors influencing the preferred types of vascular access routes for the first-time hemodialysis in our center. METHODS: We performed an epidemiological, prospective, cohort study. The study included 308 patients, who underwent hemodialysis for the first time between March 2023 and August 2023 in our hemodialysis center. We evaluated biochemical parameters, preferred vascular access routes for the first-time hemodialysis, planned/emergency hemodialysis status, the qualifications of the healthcare provider, who inserted the central venous catheter, if applicable, the presence of hypervolemia, anticoagulant use, nephrology follow-up findings, and in-hospital mortality in all patients and in those, who continued with chronic hemodialysis. RESULTS: The number of patients, who continued with chronic hemodialysis, was 167 (54.2%) and a temporary internal jugular central venous catheter was the most commonly preferred vascular access route for the first-time hemodialysis (47.3%). A central venous catheter was most commonly inserted by a nephrologist (53.7%) in chronic hemodialysis patients. Of the patients continuing with chronic hemodialysis, 45.5% were followed up in the nephrology outpatient clinic, 9.6% initiated hemodialysis on a planned basis, and 8.4% initiated hemodialysis with an arteriovenous fistula. A temporary internal jugular central venous catheter was commonly preferred when patients were followed up in the nephrology clinic and when the insertion was performed by a nephrologist; a transient femoral central venous catheter was commonly preferred in case of hypervolemia (p < .001, p < .001, and p = .028, respectively). Age, gender, etiology, anticoagulant use, or biochemical test results did not act on the selection of the access site for the insertion of central venous catheter at the time of the first hemodialysis treatment. The access site for central venous catheter was not associated with in-hospital mortality (p = .644). In the overall patient group, the in-hospital mortality was significantly low in patients followed up in the nephrology clinic (p = .014). CONCLUSION: The use of pre-emptive arteriovenous fistula for the first hemodialysis treatment occurs much less commonly than expected. Hemodialysis initiation rates with pre-emptive arteriovenous fistula lag behind nephrology outpatient follow-up rates.

8.
Case Rep Nephrol Dial ; 14(1): 56-63, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38571812

RESUMEN

Introduction: Stuck tunneled central venous catheters (CVCs) have been increasingly reported. In rare cases, the impossibility of extracting the CVC from the central vein after regular traction is the result of rigid adhesions to the surrounding fibrin sheath. Forced traction during catheter removal can cause serious complications, including cardiac tamponade, hemothorax, and hemorrhagic shock. Knowledge and experience on how to properly manage the stuck catheter are still limited. Case Presentation: Here, we present two cases that highlight the successful removal of the stuck tunneled CVC via thoracotomy through the close collaboration of multidisciplinary specialists in the best possible way. Both patients underwent an unsuccessful attempt at thrombolytic therapy with urokinase, catheter traction under the guidance of digital subtraction angiography and intraluminal balloon dilation. And we reviewed the literature on stuck catheters in the hope of providing knowledge and effective approaches to attempted removal of stuck catheters. Conclusion: There is no standardized procedure for dealing with stuck catheters. Intraluminal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty should be considered as the first-line treatment, while open surgery represents a second option only in the event of failure. Care must be taken that forced extubation can cause patients life-threatening.

9.
Perit Dial Int ; : 8968608241244939, 2024 Apr 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38661183

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (PD) carries a similar efficacy and safety profile compared to urgent-start haemodialysis (HD) but is only sparsely applied due to resource issues and concerns of complication risks. Furthermore, few data exist on adverse outcomes associated with central venous catheter (CVC) insertions in urgent-start HD patients. Thus, we sought to compare patient and dialysis-related outcomes in patients undergoing urgent-start PD or HD. METHODS: All patients initiating urgent-start PD in a tertiary research hospital in 2005-2018 were included in this retrospective, single-centre, comparative study and matched with urgent-start HD patients of similar age and chronic kidney disease aetiology. All urgent-start PDs were initiated within 72 h after catheter insertion, and urgent-start HDs were performed via a CVC. All analyses were performed at 3 months and at 1 year of follow-up, respectively. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients who commenced urgent-start PD and 58 matched urgent-start HD control patients were included. Altogether, 26 patients (29%; PD: 36%, HD 24%) died within the 1-year follow-up, and patient survival was similar at 3 months (hazard ratio (HR): 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.35-3.81, p = 0.82) and at 1 year of follow-up (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.30-1.39, p = 0.26) between the study groups. There were no differences in the total kidney replacement therapy (KRT)-related infection rate (p = 0.66) or cumulative first-year hospital care days (p = 0.43) between the treatment groups. Altogether, 139 CVCs were inserted during the 1-year follow-up. The number of CVCs per patient was associated with the emergence of blood culture-positive bacteraemia and increased cumulative first-year hospital care days. CONCLUSIONS: Patient survival, cumulative first-year hospital care days and total KRT-related infection rate at 3 months and 1-year follow-up are similar between urgent-start PD and urgent-start HD patients. Furthermore, CVC insertion rate is associated with incident blood culture-positive bacteraemia and increased cumulative first-year hospital care days.

11.
SAGE Open Med ; 12: 20503121241233213, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38628306

RESUMEN

Background: Catheter-related bloodstream infection is a well-known, severe complication of central venous catheter insertion. Studies that have evaluated the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic's influence on the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection in intensive care units are limited. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study on catheter-related bloodstream infection in coronavirus disease 2019 intensive care unit with previously documented low incidence rates to evaluate the pandemic's impact. Objectives: To evaluate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on catheter-related bloodstream infection incidence in the intensive care unit. Methods: All central venous catheter-inserted patients aged ⩾18 years admitted to the intensive care unit with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia were included. The primary outcome was the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection, and the secondary outcome was the detection of catheter-related bloodstream infection-causative microorganisms. Results: During the pandemic's first year, 124 patients were admitted, and 203 central venous catheters were inserted. Two patients developed catheter-related bloodstream infection. The incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection was 0.79/1000 catheter days. The microorganisms responsible for catheter-related bloodstream infection were Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli. Conclusion: This study revealed a low incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection in the coronavirus disease 2019-intensive care unit, thus suggesting that coronavirus disease 2019 is not a risk factor for catheter-related bloodstream infection and indicating the high resilience of well-established routines aimed at catheter-related bloodstream infection prevention.

12.
Ann Vasc Dis ; 17(1): 9-13, 2024 Mar 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38628928

RESUMEN

Objective: Hemodialysis (HD) catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are a major complication of long-/short-term catheter. Material and Methods: Patients with HD CRBSIs were identified, and their blood was taken and sent to clinical pathology for culture and sensitivity testing. The inclusion criteria were adults with end-stage renal disease who required urgent HD access in the presence of a central venous catheter (CVC) infection. Results: The most common isolates among the patients with CRBSIs were gram-positive microorganisms (57.5%) and gram-negative organisms (42.5%). Overall, in our entire study, Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen isolated, accounting for 30%, followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (20%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (12.5%), Klebsiella spp. and Acinetobacter (10%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (7.5%), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus hominis, and Enterococcus faecalis (2.5%). The commonest bacterial in femoral was S. aureus, and for subclavian was Pseudomonas aeruginosa. All S. aureus were sensitive to aminoglycosides and quinolones. P. aeruginosa was sensitive to the third generation of cephalosporins, especially cefoperazone and carbapenem. Conclusion: Nontunneled CVCs used for more than 2 weeks could increase the risk of CRBSIs. Procalcitonin and erythrocyte sedimentation rate could predict the CRBSIs in this study. This study also revealed that the gram-positive bacteria were primadonna in dialysis of CRBSIs, and most of them were sensitive to aminoglycosides.

13.
J Infect Prev ; 25(3): 73-81, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38584709

RESUMEN

Background: Unscheduled dressing changes for central venous lines (CVLs) have been shown to increase the risk of bloodstream infections. Objective: The objective of this study is to determine if the use of an innovative dressing change kit reduces the rate of unscheduled dressing changes. Methods: This pre-post interventional study took place at a large, academic, tertiary care center in metro Detroit, Michigan, the United States. We assessed the impact of the interventional dressing change procedure kit on the rate of unscheduled dressing changes for adult patients who underwent placement of a CVL inclusive of a central catheter, peripherally inserted central catheter, or hemodialysis catheter. Data was collected for the pre-intervention cohort through electronic health records (EHRs), while data for the post-intervention cohort were collected by direct observation by trained research staff in combination with EHR data. The primary outcome was the rate of unscheduled dressing changes. Secondary outcomes included rate of unscheduled dressing changes based on admission floor type, etiology of unscheduled dressing changes, and central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). Results: The study included a convenience sample of 1548 CVLs placed between May 2018 and June 2022 with a matched analysis including 488 catheters in each of the pre- and post-intervention groups. The results showed that the unadjusted rate of unscheduled dressing evaluations was significantly reduced from the pre-intervention group (0.21 per day) to the post-intervention group (0.13 per day) (p < .001). The adjusted rate ratio demonstrated the same trend at 1.00 pre- and 0.60 post-intervention (p < .001). Stratifying the analysis based on the highest level of care showed that the intervention was effective in reducing the unadjusted rate of unscheduled dressing evaluations for both the advanced and regular medical floor subgroups pre- to post-intervention; the advanced subgroup had an reduction from 0.22 to 0.15 per day (p = .001), while the regular medical floor subgroup had a reduction from 0.21 to 0.09 per day (p < .001). CLABSIs were similar in both groups (0.6% vs 0.8%; p = 1.00) in pre- and post-intervention groups, respectively. Discussion: Procedural kits for central line dressing changes are effective in reducing unscheduled dressing changes and may have a role in reducing CLABSI. Further studies assessing the impact of dressing change kits on cost, procedural compliance, and the precise impact on CLABSI are needed.

15.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; : e30990, 2024 Apr 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38605511

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Central venous catheter (CVC)-related complications remain a significant cause of morbidity in pediatric hematology-oncology. We prospectively surveyed the incidence of CVC-related complications in children with hematologic-oncologic diseases. PROCEDURE: Five-hundred-eighty-one CVCs were inserted in 421 patients from January 2010 to June 2022 (153,731 CVC days observation; follow-up data up to December 31, 2022). RESULTS: Overall, 671 complications were recorded (4.365/1000 CVC days): 49.7% malfunctions (1.88/1000 CVC days, 4.8% of CVC early removals), 23.9% bacteremia (0.90/1000, 15.1%), 19.6% mechanical complications (0.74/1000, 70.2%), 20.1% localized infections (0.76/1000, 17.1%), 0.5% thrombosis (0.02/1000, 33.3%). At multivariate analysis, risk factors for malfunction were Broviac-Hickman type of CVC (hazard ratio [HR] 2.5) or Port-a-cath (HR 3.4) or Proline (HR 4.3), p < .0001; for bacteremia double-lumen CVC (HR 3.2, p < .0001); for mechanical complications age at CVC insertion under median (HR 4.5, p < .0001) and Broviac-Hickman (HR 1.6) or Proline (HR 2.7), p = .01; finally for localized infections Broviac-Hickman (HR 2.9) or Proline (HR 4.4), p = .0001. The 2-year cumulative incidence of premature removal was 23.5%, and risk factors were age at CVC insertion under median (HR 2.4, p < .0001), Broviac-Hickman (HR 2.3) or Proline (HR 4.2), p < .0001. CONCLUSIONS: Premature removal occurs in approximately 20%-25% of long-term CVCs. A surveillance program has a fundamental role in identifying the risk factors for CVC complications and the areas of intervention to improve CVC management.

16.
Clin Exp Nephrol ; 2024 Apr 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38643288

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary care for Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) has been reported to be effective in preventing deterioration of renal function and avoiding hemodialysis induction using a central venous catheter. METHODS: We included 171 patients who received dialysis at our department between October 2014 and June 2017. Patients were divided into two groups: an inpatient group who received inpatient multidisciplinary care for CKD (educational hospitalization) prior to outpatient collaborative care from their family physician and nephrologist, and a non-inpatient group who did not receive such care. We compared factors related to dialysis induction. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in eGFR between the groups at the start of observation. The mean time from the start of observation to dialysis induction (inpatient group vs. non-inpatient group; 40.8 ± 2.8 vs. 23.9 ± 3.0 months, respectively; P < 0.001) and the rate of hemodialysis induction using a central venous catheter (22.5 vs. 47.1%, respectively; P = 0.002) were significantly different between the groups. Survival analysis showed that the time to dialysis induction was significantly longer in the inpatient group (P = 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that educational hospitalization (odds ratio = 0.30 [95% CI 0.13, 0.67]) was significantly associated with hemodialysis induction using a central venous catheter. CONCLUSION: Educational hospitalization prior to outpatient collaborative care is beneficial for preventing hemodialysis induction using a central venous catheter and postponing dialysis induction.

17.
Psicooncología (Pozuelo de Alarcón) ; 21(1): 125-134, abr.-2024. tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-232432

RESUMEN

Introducción: Los abordajes educativos son intervenciones recomendadas para atender las necesidades informativas y emocionales de los pacientes con cáncer de mama. Entre ellos se encuentran los materiales psicoeducativos, que idealmente deben de estar desarrollados con base en la evidencia, para favorecer la alfabetización en salud; sin embargo, esto es poco común. Objetivo: Diseñar y validar el contenido de un manual psicoeducativo sobre la colocación del catéter puerto en mujeres con cáncer de mama, así como analizar su nivel de legibilidad. Método: se llevó a cabo una investigación prospectiva y transversal-descriptiva, a través de un diseño de tipo no experimental. Para la evaluación del manual, se contó con la participación de 9 jueces expertos en psicooncología, terapia intravenosa y medicina. Se analizó la validez de contenido con el índice de Osterlind y la dificultad de lectura con el índice INFLESZ. Resultados: El manual obtuvo una excelente evaluación de su contenido con un índice de Osterlind de 0,88 y en el análisis de dificultad de lectura obtuvo una puntuación de 67,3, evidencia de un material muy fácil de leer. Conclusiones: Los hallazgos muestran que el manual desarrollado es de calidad, de fácil acceso y comprensión para los pacientes que se someterán a la colocación de un catéter puerto. Asimismo, se ofrece evidencia de la importancia de construir materiales educativos basados en la investigación y en indicadores estadísticos.(AU)


Introduction: Educational approaches are recommended interventions to address the informational and emotional needs of patients with breast cancer. Among them are psychoeducational materials, which ideally should be evidence-based developed, to promote health literacy; however, this is rare. Objective: Design and validate the content of a psychoeducational manual on central venous catheters in women with breast cancer, as well as analyze its level of readability. Method: a prospective and transversal-descriptive research was carried out, through a non-experimental design. To evaluate the manual, 9 expert judges in psycho-oncology, intravenous therapy and medicine participated. Content validity was analyzed with the Osterlind index and reading difficulty with the INFLESZ index. Results: The manual obtained an excellent evaluation of its content with an Osterlind index of 0.88 and in the analysis of reading difficulty it obtained a score of 67.3, evidence of very easy-to-read material. Conclusions: The findings show that the developed manual is of quality, easy to access and understand for patients who will undergo central venous catheters. Likewise, evidence is offered of the importance of building educational materials based on research and statistical indicators.(AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama , Catéteres/normas , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Manuales como Asunto , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Prospectivos , Epidemiología Descriptiva
18.
Infect Drug Resist ; 17: 779-790, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38444771

RESUMEN

Objective: Bloodstream infection (BSI) is characterized by high mortality, especially among these increasing super-elderly patients (≥85 years), and this study was conducted to understand the species distribution, typical clinical features and risk factors for poor prognosis of super-elderly patients with BSI. Methods: Based on previous work, this retrospective study was performed by reviewing an ongoing prospective medical database in a comprehensive tertiary center in China, and all super-elderly patients with BSI in the past 6 years were enrolled in this study. Results: Out of 5944 adult-patients with BSI, there were totally 431 super-elderly patients (≥85 years old) enrolled in this study and age ≥90 years accounted for 31.1% (134/431). Among these 431 super-elderly patients with BSI, 40 patients (9.3%) were diagnosed with BSI and the remained 401 super-elderly patients (90.7%) were defined as hospital-acquired BSI. The typical feature of these super-elderly patients with BSI was the high proportion of patients with various comorbidities, such as cardiovascular disease (83.8%), ischemic cerebrovascular disease (63.3%) and pulmonary infection (61.0%). The other typical feature was that most (60.1%) of these patients had been hospitalized for long time (≥28 days) prior to the onset of BSI, and most patients had received various invasive treatments, such as indwelling central venous catheter (53.1%) and indwelling urinary catheter (47.1%). Unfortunately, due to these adverse features above, both the 7-day short-term mortality (13.2%, 57/431) and the 30-day long-term mortality (24.8%, 107/431) were high. The multivariate analysis showed that both chronic liver failure (OR 7.9, 95% CI 2.3-27.8, P=0.001) and indwelling urinary catheter (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.7, P=0.023) were independent risk factors for 7-day short-term mortality, but not for 30-day long-term mortality. In addition, the microbiology results showed that the most common species were associated with nosocomial infection or self-opportunistic infection, such as Staphylococcus hominis (18.3%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (11.8%), Escherichia coli (9.7%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (9.3%) and Candida albicans (8.6%, fungi). Conclusion: Super-elderly patients with BSI had typical features, regardless of the pathogenic species distribution and their drug resistance, or clinical features and their risk factors for poor prognosis. These typical features deserved attention and could be used for the prevention and treatment of BSI among super-elderly patients.

19.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 78(4): 918-926, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38451061

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Patients with intestinal failure require central venous access which puts them at risk for central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). Maintaining vascular patency is critical for this population to receive nutrition support. When CLABSIs occur line salvage can help maintain vascular access. The aim of this study is to assess factors associated with safe and successful central venous catheter salvage. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients with intestinal failure at two tertiary care institutions between 2012 and 2020. The study examined the rates of attempted salvage, factors associated with successful salvage, and complications associated with salvage attempts. RESULTS: Over the study period, 76 patients with intestinal failure were include while central venous access was in place. There were a total of 94 CLABSIs. Salvage was more likely to be attempted when patients were under the direct care of an intestinal rehabilitation service (95% vs. 68%, p = 0.04). The overall successful salvage rate was 91.6% (n = 77). Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and polymicrobial infections had successful salvage rates of 97%, 92%, and 94% respectively. The successful salvage rate for fungal infections was 40%. There was no difference in 30-day complication rates for hospital readmission, intensive care unit admission, and death between patients who underwent salvage attempt and those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Central line salvage can be safely attempted for many infections in patients with intestinal failure, leading to vascular access preservation.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Enfermedades Intestinales , Insuficiencia Intestinal , Sepsis , Humanos , Niño , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Enfermedades Intestinales/terapia , Enfermedades Intestinales/complicaciones , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/microbiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos
20.
J Clin Med ; 13(6)2024 Mar 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38541883

RESUMEN

Background: Central venous catheters (CVCs) are indispensable tools in intensive care and emergency medicine. CVC malpositions still occur frequently and can cause various complications leading to increased patient mortality. A microbubbles test (MBT) can be used to confirm correct CVC positioning. However, there is serious doubt regarding whether the currently applied threshold of a 2 s push-to-bubbles time (PTB time) for rapid atrial swirl sign (RASS) in an MBT is reliable and accurate. The aim of the present study was to prove the quality of a new threshold: 1 s. Methods: Consecutive patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in a German neurological specialist hospital from 1 March 2021 to 20 July 2022 were enrolled. After ultrasound-guided CVC insertion, an MBT was performed, PTB time was measured, and RASS was interpreted. Additionally, a chest X-ray (CXR) was requested to check CVC position. Results: A total of 102 CVCs (98% jugular and 2% subclavian) were inserted in 102 patients (38% female and 62% male; median age: 66 years). Negative RASS (PTB time > 1 s) was observed in 2 out of 102 patients, resulting in an echocardiographic malposition rate of 2.0%. CXR confirmed the echocardiographic results. After correcting CVC position in the initially malpositioned CVCs, the PTB time was <1 s (positive RASS). The MBT protocol took about 0.5 min on average, while the CXR results were all available within 30 min. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value were each 100% for the detection of CVC malpositions via an MBT using a threshold of 1 s compared to CXR. Conclusions: A new threshold of a 1 s PTB time for RASS in an MBT could detect CVC malpositions with excellent quality compared to CXR. Since the MBT was fast and safe and could be performed at the bedside, we propose that an MBT with the new and reliable threshold of 1 s should be routinely used in patient care.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...